EstatePlanningAdvisorMatch

SLAT vs GRAT: Which trust strategy moves more wealth out of your estate?

Two of the most widely-used irrevocable trust strategies for high-net-worth estate planning — but they work very differently. The right one depends on whether you want to use lifetime exemption now, whether your asset is expected to appreciate strongly, and whether you need spousal access.

Quick summary: A GRAT transfers appreciation above the IRS hurdle rate at near-zero gift-tax cost — great for high-growth assets (pre-IPO equity, business interests). A SLAT uses your lifetime exemption to remove assets AND future growth from your estate while preserving indirect spousal access — better when you want to use exemption efficiently and keep flexibility.

SLAT vs GRAT comparison calculator

Enter your asset value, expected growth rate, and trust term. The calculator shows how much each strategy transfers to heirs and at what cost.

Set to the current month's §7520 rate. Updated monthly by IRS.
Federal: $15,000,000/person in 2026 (OBBBA, permanent). Reduce if you've made prior taxable gifts.
Federal top rate is 40%. Your blended rate may be lower.

How each strategy works

SLAT — Spousal Lifetime Access Trust

You (the donor spouse) fund an irrevocable trust for the benefit of your spouse. The contribution is a completed gift — it uses your lifetime exemption but removes the asset and all future appreciation from your taxable estate. Your spouse can receive distributions under an HEMS (health, education, maintenance, support) standard, giving the household indirect access to those assets during your spouse's lifetime.

GRAT — Grantor Retained Annuity Trust

You contribute assets to an irrevocable trust, retain the right to receive fixed annuity payments for a set term (typically 2–10 years), and structure the annuity to equal the IRS's expected value — so the gift value is approximately zero. Any appreciation the asset earns above the §7520 hurdle rate passes to heirs with no gift tax and no exemption use.

When to use each strategy

Situation Better choice Why
Pre-IPO stock, closely-held business expected to 2–5x GRAT Massive appreciation above 4.6% hurdle → huge transfer at zero gift-tax cost
Stable income-producing real estate or diversified portfolio SLAT Moderate growth; GRAT hurdle may not be exceeded reliably. SLAT removes assets + growth with certainty.
Grantor has significant remaining lifetime exemption SLAT Use exemption efficiently to remove assets + future appreciation together
Grantor has little exemption remaining (prior taxable gifts) GRAT Transfers appreciation without touching remaining exemption
Want to keep spousal access to transferred assets SLAT Spouse can receive distributions. GRAT provides no ongoing access.
Grantor has health concerns SLAT GRAT fails if grantor dies during term. SLAT has no mortality risk to the transfer.
Estate is near but not far above exemption ($15–25M) Both SLAT uses exemption; rolling GRATs capture appreciation without using more

Can you use both a SLAT and a GRAT?

Yes — and HNW families often do. A common structure: fund a SLAT with diversified assets to use exemption and retain spousal access, then run rolling GRATs on high-growth concentrated positions (pre-IPO stock, business interests) to capture appreciation above the hurdle without consuming additional exemption. The strategies complement each other.

The sequencing matters: if you're going to use a SLAT for one spouse, don't establish a mirror SLAT for the other spouse — that triggers the reciprocal trust doctrine. The GRAT is a better second tool for the other spouse or for the concentrated position.

Talk to a specialist about SLAT and GRAT strategy

The math favors one approach for your specific asset mix, growth projections, and health situation. A fee-only estate planning advisor models your actual numbers, coordinates with your trust attorney, and helps you avoid the reciprocal trust doctrine and other drafting pitfalls. Free match.