SLAT vs GRAT: Which trust strategy moves more wealth out of your estate?
Two of the most widely-used irrevocable trust strategies for high-net-worth estate planning — but they work very differently. The right one depends on whether you want to use lifetime exemption now, whether your asset is expected to appreciate strongly, and whether you need spousal access.
SLAT vs GRAT comparison calculator
Enter your asset value, expected growth rate, and trust term. The calculator shows how much each strategy transfers to heirs and at what cost.
How each strategy works
SLAT — Spousal Lifetime Access Trust
You (the donor spouse) fund an irrevocable trust for the benefit of your spouse. The contribution is a completed gift — it uses your lifetime exemption but removes the asset and all future appreciation from your taxable estate. Your spouse can receive distributions under an HEMS (health, education, maintenance, support) standard, giving the household indirect access to those assets during your spouse's lifetime.
- Uses exemption: Yes — $15M per person in 2026 (OBBBA permanent). Without exemption, gift tax applies at 40%.
- What transfers: The full asset value plus all future appreciation.
- Spousal access: Yes, via distributions to spouse. At spouse's death, assets continue for descendants.
- Key risk: Reciprocal trust doctrine. If both spouses establish identical SLATs for each other, IRS can unwind them. Different trustees, different distribution terms, staggered dates required.
- Divorce risk: If you divorce, spouse remains trust beneficiary (irrevocable). Consider carefully.
GRAT — Grantor Retained Annuity Trust
You contribute assets to an irrevocable trust, retain the right to receive fixed annuity payments for a set term (typically 2–10 years), and structure the annuity to equal the IRS's expected value — so the gift value is approximately zero. Any appreciation the asset earns above the §7520 hurdle rate passes to heirs with no gift tax and no exemption use.
- Uses exemption: No (zeroed-out structure). Preserves your exemption for other uses.
- What transfers: Only the appreciation above the §7520 rate. If the asset underperforms the hurdle, nothing transfers — the annuity payments return everything to you (no loss, just no gain).
- Spousal access: No. Annuity goes back to grantor. Spouse has no access to trust assets.
- Mortality risk: If grantor dies during the trust term, assets return to the estate. Short terms (2-3 years) reduce this risk. Rolling GRATs replenish if the grantor survives.
- Legislative risk: Congress has periodically proposed minimum GRAT terms (10 years) and minimum remainder values — these proposals haven't passed, but watch for legislative changes.
When to use each strategy
| Situation | Better choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-IPO stock, closely-held business expected to 2–5x | GRAT | Massive appreciation above 4.6% hurdle → huge transfer at zero gift-tax cost |
| Stable income-producing real estate or diversified portfolio | SLAT | Moderate growth; GRAT hurdle may not be exceeded reliably. SLAT removes assets + growth with certainty. |
| Grantor has significant remaining lifetime exemption | SLAT | Use exemption efficiently to remove assets + future appreciation together |
| Grantor has little exemption remaining (prior taxable gifts) | GRAT | Transfers appreciation without touching remaining exemption |
| Want to keep spousal access to transferred assets | SLAT | Spouse can receive distributions. GRAT provides no ongoing access. |
| Grantor has health concerns | SLAT | GRAT fails if grantor dies during term. SLAT has no mortality risk to the transfer. |
| Estate is near but not far above exemption ($15–25M) | Both | SLAT uses exemption; rolling GRATs capture appreciation without using more |
Can you use both a SLAT and a GRAT?
Yes — and HNW families often do. A common structure: fund a SLAT with diversified assets to use exemption and retain spousal access, then run rolling GRATs on high-growth concentrated positions (pre-IPO stock, business interests) to capture appreciation above the hurdle without consuming additional exemption. The strategies complement each other.
The sequencing matters: if you're going to use a SLAT for one spouse, don't establish a mirror SLAT for the other spouse — that triggers the reciprocal trust doctrine. The GRAT is a better second tool for the other spouse or for the concentrated position.
Related reading
Talk to a specialist about SLAT and GRAT strategy
The math favors one approach for your specific asset mix, growth projections, and health situation. A fee-only estate planning advisor models your actual numbers, coordinates with your trust attorney, and helps you avoid the reciprocal trust doctrine and other drafting pitfalls. Free match.